Daniel W. Woods, University of Edinburgh; Rainer Böhme, University of Innsbruck; Josephine Wolff, Tufts University; Daniel Schwarcz, University of Minnesota
Incident Response (IR) allows victim firms to detect, contain, and recover from security incidents. It should also help the wider community avoid similar attacks in the future. In pursuit of these goals, technical practitioners are increasingly influenced by stakeholders like cyber insurers and lawyers. This paper explores these impacts via a multi-stage, mixed methods research design that involved 69 expert interviews, data on commercial relationships, and an online validation workshop. The first stage of our study established 11 stylized facts that describe how cyber insurance sends work to a small numbers of IR firms, drives down the fee paid, and appoints lawyers to direct technical investigators. The second stage showed that lawyers when directing incident response often: introduce legalistic contractual and communication steps that slow-down incident response; advise IR practitioners not to write down remediation steps or to produce formal reports; and restrict access to any documents produced.
Open Access Media
USENIX is committed to Open Access to the research presented at our events. Papers and proceedings are freely available to everyone once the event begins. Any video, audio, and/or slides that are posted after the event are also free and open to everyone. Support USENIX and our commitment to Open Access.
author = {Daniel W. Woods and Rainer B{\"o}hme and Josephine Wolff and Daniel Schwarcz},
title = {Lessons Lost: Incident Response in the Age of Cyber Insurance and Breach Attorneys},
booktitle = {32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23)},
year = {2023},
isbn = {978-1-939133-37-3},
address = {Anaheim, CA},
pages = {2259--2273},
url = {https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity23/presentation/woods},
publisher = {USENIX Association},
month = aug
}